Nutrition: How the Body Uses FoodChapter 1

Energy and the Macronutrients

7 concepts

In this chapter

This chapter is about what happens to food after it is eaten — how much energy it carries and where the body spends it, how it is broken down and taken in, what becomes of the carbohydrate, fat and protein, how the body keeps its water — and, last, how to read the studies that claims about food rest on. It teaches , , , , , and as science; it does not tell you what to eat.

Energy: The Kilocalorie, and Where the Body Spends It

Definition

Food carries chemical energy, measured in kilocalories — the food "Calorie", about 4.2 , the heat that warms a kilogram of water one degree. Energy balance is intake against expenditure: the body spends on rest, digestion and movement, and stores what it does not spend.

The test

Place any "calorie" claim on one side of the balance, in one share: rest is a sedentary adult's largest, roughly 60–75%; digesting food about a tenth; movement the rest. As physics, energy unspent is stored; as physiology, expenditure moves — falling as a body shrinks, adjusting to intake — so the sum is not fixed.

Example

A hypothetical label — 10 g protein, 30 g carbohydrate, 5 g fat — comes to 205 at the standard 4, 4 and 9 per gram, worked below; the body's yield differs by food.

The trap

"The label's calories are what the body gets." Labels use average factors; in people, the factors overstated almonds by a third, and protein costs 20–30% of its energy to process. "Sitting still burns almost nothing." Rest is the largest share; heartbeat, breathing and cell chemistry never stop. "500 less a day is a pound a week, for ever." That rule holds expenditure fixed; it falls as weight falls, so loss slows and stops.

Worked example
  1. Read the grams of each macronutrient. The hypothetical label: 10 g protein, 30 g carbohydrate (of which 4 g fiber), 5 g fat.
  2. Apply the general factors — 4 per gram of protein and of carbohydrate, 9 per gram of fat: 10×4+30×4+5×9=40+120+45=20510 \times 4 + 30 \times 4 + 5 \times 9 = 40 + 120 + 45 = 205 .
  3. Convert to kilojoules if wanted: 205×4.184858205 \times 4.184 \approx 858 .
  4. Say what the number is. An estimate from average factors, one of several methods U.S. labeling permits — another subtracts the fiber from the carbohydrate first, giving 26×4=10426 \times 4 = 104 and a total of 189189 — and not a measurement of what any one body absorbs.

The common slip is treating step 2's answer as the energy the body will get: the factors are averages over foods, and the fiber variant shows the label itself can move by 16 on a definitional choice.

Expanded

The kilocalorie is a unit of heat, and food energy is still stated in it because the first measurements burned food in a calorimeter and measured the heat. One is 4.184 (4.1868 in the older "International Table" definition), and a food "Calorie" with a capital C is a kilocalorie. The label's 4, 4 and 9 per gram are "general factors" — U.S. regulation permits them alongside food-specific factors, a fiber-subtracting variant, and direct measurement. What a body actually gets depends on the food: in eighteen adults fed measured diets, whole almonds delivered about 4.6 per gram against the 6.0–6.1 the factors predict, a 32% overestimate.

Where the energy goes. Basal metabolic rate is what a body spends at rest, in a neutral temperature, after digestion is complete — the cost of being alive. About 40% of the energy released in breaking down fuel is captured as ATP; the rest is heat, which is why the body is warm. For a mostly sedentary adult, resting metabolism is roughly 60–75% of the day's spending, the thermic cost of processing food about 10%, and activity the remainder — the only share under direct control. The thermic cost differs by macronutrient: about 0–3% of the energy in fat, 5–10% in carbohydrate, and 20–30% in protein.

Physics against physiology. Conservation of energy is exact: over any period the change in the body's stored energy equals intake minus expenditure. What is not fixed is the expenditure side, and this is what the "3,500 per pound" rule misses — it treats the daily deficit as constant, when expenditure falls as mass falls, so its predictions run on with no plateau. The fall can outrun the loss of mass: of sixteen contestants studied after a televised weight-loss competition, fourteen were re-measured six years later — their resting metabolic rate was 704 a day below where it had started, about 500 a day lower than their new size alone would predict. Intake moves too: twenty adults living on a research ward, offered ultra-processed and unprocessed menus matched for energy, macronutrients, sugar, sodium and fiber, ate 508 a day more on the ultra-processed one. For orientation, the U.S. reference estimates of daily need are 1,600–2,400 for adult women and 2,000–3,000 for adult men, depending on age and activity, for reference-sized adults — population estimates, not anyone's prescription.

Digestion Breaks Food Down; Absorption Takes It In

Definition

Digestion breaks food down — mechanically by chewing and churning, chemically by enzymes that cut large molecules into small ones: starch to sugars, protein to amino acids, fat to fatty acids and glycerol. Absorption moves those molecules across the gut wall into blood or lymph, almost all in the small intestine.

The test

Follow the molecule: ask whether it was cut small enough, and where it crossed. Whole proteins and starches do not enter blood; amino acids and glucose do, through the small intestine's lining; fats go first by lymph. Fiber, which no human enzyme can cut, is not absorbed as such; in the large intestine bacteria ferment some.

Example

A hypothetical bowl of rice and beans: the stomach churns it and pepsin begins on the protein; in the small intestine, pancreatic and gut-lining enzymes finish starch to glucose and protein to amino acids, which cross into blood over the next hours; the fiber passes on.

The trap

"Digestion and absorption happen in the stomach." The stomach churns and starts on protein; nearly all absorption is in the small intestine, the large intestine mostly recovering water. "Protein enters the blood as protein." As amino acids, or not at all. "Fiber does nothing." Human enzymes cannot cut it, but it speeds passage and colon bacteria ferment part of it.

Expanded

The digestive tract does six things in sequence: ingestion, propulsion (swallowing, then peristalsis — waves of muscle contraction), mechanical digestion (chewing, the stomach's churning, the small intestine's segmenting), chemical digestion, absorption, and defecation. Chemical digestion begins in the mouth with salivary amylase on starch and continues in the stomach, where acid and pepsin start on protein; the small intestine does most of the work with the pancreas's enzymes (amylase, trypsin, chymotrypsin, lipases) and its own lining's enzymes (sucrase, maltase, lactase, peptidases), and it is where the products cross. Sucrose is split into glucose and fructose, lactose into glucose and galactose, starch down to glucose; glucose and galactose are pumped across with sodium, fructose diffuses.

Fat needs help because it does not dissolve in water: bile from the liver, stored in the gallbladder, breaks it into droplets; pancreatic lipase cuts the triglycerides; the pieces are ferried in tiny bile-salt spheres to the lining, reassembled, and packaged as chylomicrons that enter the lymph through lacteals before reaching the blood. The fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E and K ride the same route. Water moves in large amounts: about nine liters of fluid enter the small intestine each day and about 90% is absorbed there; the large intestine takes back most of the rest. Chyme takes some 3–5 hours to pass through the small intestine, and residue spends 12–24 hours in the large intestine, where bacteria ferment remaining carbohydrate and the waste is formed into stool.

The point of the outline for the rest of the chapter: everything the body does with food it does with the molecules that crossed the wall — , and glycerol, , , vitamins, minerals — not with the food. That is why the a body gets can differ from the label, and why every unit that follows starts from a molecule in the blood.

Digestible Carbohydrate Arrives in the Blood Mostly as Glucose, and Blood Glucose Is Regulated

Definition

Carbohydrates are sugars, starch and fiber; the digestible ones arrive in the blood mostly as glucose. Blood glucose is regulated: insulin moves glucose into cells and into glycogen stores in liver and muscle, and glucagon draws it back out, holding the level in a narrow band between meals.

The test

Ask what the loop is doing, not what the meal was: rising glucose → insulin → uptake and storage; falling glucose → glucagon → glycogen breakdown and new glucose from lactate, glycerol and amino acids. Surplus glucose goes into glycogen first; conversion to fat waits until those stores are full.

Example

Hypothetical: after a rice dinner, Tomas's blood glucose rises and falls back within hours as insulin acts; at three in the morning glucagon holds it steady from liver glycogen; by mid-morning, still unfed, his liver is making new glucose.

The blood-glucose loop: a rise after a meal releases insulin, which moves glucose into cells and into glycogen and brings the level down; a fall between meals releases glucagon, which breaks glycogen down and makes new glucose in the liver and brings the level up. Two hormones pulling opposite ways hold the level in a band.
The blood-glucose loop: a rise after a meal releases insulin, which moves glucose into cells and into glycogen and brings the level down; a fall between meals releases glucagon, which breaks glycogen down and makes new glucose in the liver and brings the level up. Two hormones pulling opposite ways hold the level in a band.drawn by figures/fig-blood-glucose-loop.py
The trap

"No sugar or starch means no glucose in the blood." The liver makes it from lactate, glycerol and amino acids; the loop keeps the level up. "Blood glucose just tracks the last meal." Two hormones hold it in a band; the meal is a disturbance the loop corrects. "Unused carbohydrate turns straight into fat." Glycogen first; in the men measured, fat synthesis rose only once stores of about 15 g per kilogram were full.

Expanded

The sugars. Glucose, fructose and galactose are single sugars; sucrose (table sugar) is glucose joined to fructose and lactose (milk sugar) glucose joined to galactose; starch and glycogen are long chains of glucose, and cellulose — the main fiber of plants — is a glucose chain in a linkage no human enzyme can cut. So digestible carbohydrate arrives in the blood mostly as glucose, and it is glucose the loop regulates. The U.S. reference sets a Recommended Dietary Allowance for carbohydrate of 130 g a day for adults and a fiber goal of 14 g per 1,000 — reference figures for a population, not a rule for a reader.

The loop, in the source's own terms. In the absorptive state, the hours after a meal, rising blood glucose makes the pancreas's beta cells release insulin; insulin has liver, muscle and fat cells take glucose up, has liver and muscle store it as glycogen, and promotes fat and protein synthesis. In the postabsorptive state, once the meal is stored and glucose drifts down, the alpha cells release glucagon, which has the liver break glycogen back to glucose (glycogenolysis) and make new glucose from lactate, glycerol and amino acids (gluconeogenesis). The source gives the band the loop defends as roughly 70–110 mg/dL, about 4–6 mmol/L. If a fast runs to days, the body spares glucose for the brain, muscle turns to fatty acids, and after several days ketone bodies made from fat become a major fuel for the heart and other organs.

Where surplus goes. Glycogen is a bounded store — in three men fed a large carbohydrate excess after depletion, capacity was about 15 g per kilogram of body weight and could take roughly 500 g before net fat synthesis began; once it was full, the surplus was disposed of by burning more carbohydrate and by making fat, around 150 g a day from some 475 g of carbohydrate. The order matters for the trap: carbohydrate becomes body fat at sustained excess, not on the evening it is eaten.

Fats: The Densest Fuel, a Routine One, and Two the Body Cannot Make

Definition

Dietary fats are mostly triglycerides — three fatty acids on a glycerol — digested with bile's help, absorbed by way of the lymph, and denser in energy than the other macronutrients: about 9 per gram against 4. The body burns fatty acids as a routine fuel, stores surplus energy from any source as fat, and cannot make two fatty acids it needs.

The test

Keep three roles apart: fuel — fatty acids released between meals and at rest as glucagon rises; store — triglyceride in fat tissue, built from dietary fat or from surplus glucose; nutrient — linoleic and alpha-linolenic acid, which must come from food, and the vitamins absorbed only with fat.

Example

Hypothetical Farah eats little fat but a year-long surplus of rice and bread, and gains fat: with glycogen full, her liver built fatty acids from surplus glucose — stored energy from a fatless source.

The trap

"Body fat comes from eating fat." It is surplus energy of any kind; excess glucose becomes fatty acids. "The body doesn't need dietary fat." It cannot make linoleic or alpha-linolenic acid, and absorbs vitamins A, D, E and K only with fat. "Fat is only burned in starvation." Falling glucose between meals releases fatty acids for fuel every day; starvation deepens the reliance rather than beginning it.

Expanded

Fuel. In the postabsorptive state glucagon stimulates lipolysis — triglyceride split into fatty acids and glycerol — and the fatty acids are broken down in mitochondria, two carbons at a time, to feed the same cycle that burns glucose; the glycerol goes to the liver, where it can become glucose. Fatty acids cannot be turned back into glucose, which is why the brain, in a long fast, is supplied by gluconeogenesis and then increasingly by ketone bodies made from fat. Per gram, fat carries more than twice the energy of carbohydrate or protein — the 9 against 4 of the label — because its carbons are more reduced; the same reason makes it the compact way to store energy.

Store. Dietary fat, digested and reassembled, reaches fat tissue as triglyceride; surplus glucose is converted to fatty acids in the liver (lipogenesis) once glycogen is full, and stored the same way. The store is not inert: it is drawn on every day between meals and refilled after them, and its size is the running total of .

Nutrient. Linoleic acid (an omega-6 fatty acid) and alpha-linolenic acid (an omega-3) are essential — the body cannot make them, so they must come from food; the body converts alpha-linolenic acid to the longer omega-3s EPA and DHA only to a small extent, under 15% by reported rates. The U.S. reference sets adequate intakes of 12 g of linoleic and 1.1 g of alpha-linolenic acid a day for women aged 19–30, and 17 g and 1.6 g for men — population reference values. The fat-soluble vitamins are absorbed inside the same bile-salt spheres as dietary fat, so a meal's fat carries them in.

Proteins: Amino Acids in Turnover, Not in Store

Definition

Proteins are chains of twenty amino acids, nine of which the body cannot make and must obtain from food. Digested to amino acids, dietary protein feeds the pool from which the body's own proteins are continually broken down and rebuilt; there is no store for the surplus.

The test

Follow the amino acid: into a protein being built, or — if none is wanted — stripped of its nitrogen, which leaves as urea in urine, while the carbon skeleton is burned, made into glucose or, in surplus, fat. Ask what is being built before predicting what more protein will do.

Example

Hypothetical Ravi doubles his protein and changes nothing else; his body already makes all the protein it needs, so the surplus becomes urea and fuel, not muscle.

The trap

"More protein means more muscle." Muscle is built to demand, not supply: in 49 trials of adults doing resistance training, gains in lean mass stopped rising once intake passed about 1.6 g per kilogram a day. "The body keeps a protein reserve like its fat reserve." It has no storage mechanism; in starvation it breaks down working muscle, which is a loss, not a withdrawal. "Protein is protein." Nine amino acids must arrive from food, whatever the total.

Expanded

The nine essential amino acids are histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, tryptophan and valine; the other eleven the body makes, some only when it is well. Digestion frees them — pepsin in the stomach, trypsin and chymotrypsin from the pancreas, peptidases in the intestinal lining — and they cross into blood as single amino acids for the liver and every other tissue.

Turnover and disposal. Body proteins are made and unmade continually, so the pool is always in use; what is drawn from it beyond building is deaminated — the amino group removed as ammonia, which the liver combines with carbon dioxide into urea for the kidneys to excrete — and the carbon skeleton enters the same pathways as any fuel, as pyruvate, acetyl-CoA or a cycle intermediate. Because there is no store, the source states the rule plainly: amino acids in excess are converted to glucose or ketones, or decomposed. Processing protein is itself costly — 20–30% of its energy is spent in the handling, against 5–10% for carbohydrate and 0–3% for fat.

Reference values, and what they are. The U.S. Recommended Dietary Allowance for protein is 0.8 g per kilogram of body weight a day for adults — 46 g for the reference woman and 56 g for the reference man — an allowance set to cover the needs of about 97% of healthy people, not a ceiling on what the body can use and not a target for any one reader. The trials that measured what more protein does found the extra gain in lean mass, in adults doing resistance training, level off at intakes above about 1.6 g per kilogram a day. What the number is not: a rule for the learner, whose needs are their own and their clinician's question.

Hydration Is Water Balance, Regulated by Thirst and the Kidney

Definition

Water balance is water in — drink, the water in food, a little made by metabolism — matched against water out in urine, sweat, breath and stool, so that the body's water, half to three-fifths of an adult's mass, holds steady. Thirst and the kidney, under antidiuretic hormone, regulate it; no quota does.

The test

Ask what the regulators are doing: blood slightly too concentrated → hypothalamic sensors → thirst and → the kidney reabsorbs water, less urine; blood dilute → less → more urine. Count every source and every loss, not glasses.

Example

A hypothetical adult takes in about 2.5 L a day — a fifth in food, 230 mL made in cells — and loses about as much, 1.5 L as urine; on a quiet day with little drink, less urine and no thirst are the balance holding.

The trap

"Eight glasses of plain water a day; coffee doesn't count." No study supports the rule; the U.S. reference intakes count food and every beverage, coffee included, and set no rule in glasses. "Thirsty means already dehydrated." Thirst is the regulator answering a small rise in blood concentration — the system working, though heat, exertion, illness and age can outrun it. "Balance is only about drinking." The kidney adjusts outflow hour by hour.

Expanded

How much water, and where. Water is about 75% of body mass in infants, 50–60% in adult men and women, and as little as 45% in old age, the proportions of muscle, fat and bone shifting the total; most of it is inside cells. A typical adult takes in about 2,500 mL a day, of which some 230 mL is made in cells as fuel is burned and the rest arrives in food and drink; about the same leaves, most as urine — around 1.5 L — and the remainder through the skin, from the lungs (together the "insensible" loss), and in stool. The National Academies' 2004 reference report put average total water intake for adequately hydrated adults at about 2.7 L for women and 3.7 L for men, about 80% of it from water and other beverages, caffeinated ones included, and about 20% from food.

The regulators. Osmoreceptors in the hypothalamus watch the concentration of the blood; when water is lost in breath, sweat or urine and the blood grows more concentrated, they trigger thirst and the release of , which has the kidney's collecting ducts insert water channels and reabsorb water, so urine falls and concentrates; when the blood is dilute, falls, the channels are withdrawn and more water is passed. Dehydration in the source's sense — a net loss of water leaving too little in blood and tissues — is what the loop exists to prevent, and it can be outrun.

Two things this unit deliberately does not say. It does not say how much any reader should drink: the review that traced the "eight glasses" rule found no scientific study behind it and, in the surveys it examined, healthy adults in temperate, mostly sedentary lives met their needs at lower totals — while saying plainly that vigorous work, heat and some illnesses call for much more. And it does not turn the reference intakes into targets: the report that set them said it offered no rule of thumb in glasses, and the figures are population averages.

Reading Nutrition Evidence: What a Study Can and Cannot Show

Definition

An observational study records what people eat and what happens to them; a randomized controlled trial assigns the food by lot and compares outcomes. The first shows association, not by itself cause; the second can, but only for its intervention, people and time.

The test

Three questions of any claim: what was measured, and how — self-report understates energy intake by a tenth to a third; who was compared with whom, and what else differed; and what it could not show — a null result is silent beyond its own dose, people and years.

Example

In one trial's placebo group, men who took at least 80% of their inert pills had 15.1% five-year mortality against 28.3% for the rest: faithful pill-taking marked a kind of person, who did better regardless.

The trap

"People who eat X have less Y, so X prevents Y." X-eaters differ in health, wealth and habits; the placebo adherers show how much that carries. "A trial settles it." The Women's Health Initiative assigned 48,835 women to a low-fat pattern and found no significant fall in heart disease or breast cancer — an 8-point cut in fat, not the 20 % target, over eight years, not forty; a trial says what it can. "Studies measure what people ate." Usually what they say they ate.

Case

Observational studies had found that people who ate more carotenoid-rich fruit and vegetables, and who had more beta-carotene in their blood, got less lung cancer. From 1985 to 1993 a randomized trial gave 29,133 Finnish male smokers aged 50 to 69 beta-carotene, vitamin E, both, or a placebo, expecting to see the protection. Instead, lung cancer incidence was 18% higher among the men who received beta-carotene (95% confidence interval 3 to 36%), and total mortality 8% higher. The association had been real; the cause was not the pill, or not in that form and dose.

Expanded

The designs, in the standard vocabulary. In an experimental study the investigator decides who is exposed — in a randomized trial, by lot; in an observational study the investigator only records exposure and outcome. Observational designs differ in direction: a cohort study records exposure and follows people forward; a case-control study starts from people with the disease and looks back at exposure; a cross-sectional study measures both at once. The CDC's own text says the limit plainly: epidemiology by itself can never prove that a particular exposure caused a particular outcome. Two failures to name in any observational result — confounding, where the exposed differ in something else that carries the outcome, and reverse causation, where the outcome shaped the exposure — are why the placebo adherers of the Coronary Drug Project matter to nutrition: adherence itself marked a lower-risk person, 15.1% against 28.3% five-year mortality with no active drug in either group.

What a trial can say, and what tight control buys. Randomization spreads the unmeasured differences across the arms, so a difference in outcome can be laid to the intervention; the price is scope. The Women's Health Initiative randomized 48,835 postmenopausal women in 1993–98 and followed them 8.1 years; the intervention group cut fat by about 8 percentage points of energy, not to the 20% of energy planned, and neither coronary disease nor invasive breast cancer fell significantly. That is a result about that intervention as delivered, in those women, over that time. At the other extreme of control, twenty adults lived on a research ward for four weeks, two on each of two menus matched for energy, macronutrients, sugar, sodium and fiber and eaten as they pleased; on the ultra-processed menu they ate 508 a day more and gained 0.9 kg, on the unprocessed one they lost 0.9 kg. Intake was measured, not asked — which is what makes the difference believable — and the study says nothing about years or about life outside a ward.

Measurement, and multiplicity. In 484 adults whose true energy expenditure was measured with doubly labeled water, food-frequency questionnaires understated energy intake by 31–36% in men and 34–38% in women; even 24-hour recalls understated it by 12–20%. And single studies are many: of 50 ingredients drawn from random cookbook recipes, 40 had published studies of their cancer risk; 72% of 264 single-study assessments claimed an increased or a decreased risk, most on weak or no statistical support, and the pooled estimates from meta-analyses were on average null. The chapter's three questions — what was measured, who was compared, what could not be shown — are what to ask of the next headline.

One Meal, All Seven IdeasSynthesis

A last hypothetical: rice, lentils, a spoon of oil and a glass of water for dinner, and a headline next morning saying such dinners "protect the heart". The label's number is an estimate from average factors, and the body's will count what it absorbs against a day whose largest cost was being alive at rest.

Nothing in the bowl reaches the blood as it is: cuts the rice's starch to glucose and the lentils' protein to amino acids, the oil goes by the lymph, the fiber on to the colon. The glucose that arrives is a disturbance the corrects with insulin, and by dawn glucagon will be holding the level from liver glycogen while muscle burns — the routine fuel, and the store any surplus would have joined.

The amino acids join a pool in constant ; whatever is not built is deaminated and burned. The water, with the water in the food, enters a the kidney and thirst are already managing.

And the headline: who was compared with whom, what was measured and how, and what the study could not have shown — , asked before belief.

Sources

  1. 1 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology (first edition), Preface — the licence statementsource
  2. 2 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §24.1: Overview of Metabolic Reactionssource
  3. 3 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §24.2: Carbohydrate Metabolismsource
  4. 4 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §24.3: Lipid Metabolismsource
  5. 5 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §24.4: Protein Metabolismsource
  6. 6 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §24.5: Metabolic States of the Bodysource
  7. 7 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §24.6: Energy and Heat Balancesource
  8. 8 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §24.7: Nutrition and Dietsource
  9. 9 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §23.2: Digestive System Processes and Regulationsource
  10. 10 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §23.5: The Small and Large Intestinessource
  11. 11 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §23.7: Chemical Digestion and Absorption: A Closer Looksource
  12. 12 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §17.9: The Endocrine Pancreassource
  13. 13 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §26.1: Body Fluids and Fluid Compartmentssource
  14. 14 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology §26.2: Water Balancesource
  15. 15 OpenStax Anatomy and Physiology 2e §24.7: Nutrition and Diet (consulted only — CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 by its preface and page footer, not adapted)source
  16. 16 U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025, 9th ed. (Dec 2020), Appendix 1 Table A1-2 (Daily Nutritional Goals, Ages 2 and Older) and Appendix 2 Table A2-2 (Estimated Calorie Needs per Day) — U.S. government work, public domain; cited for figures and definitions onlysource
  17. 17 21 CFR §101.9(c)(1)(i), Nutrition labeling of food — the permitted methods for calculating calories, including the general factors of 4, 4 and 9 calories per gram (U.S. federal regulation, public domain)source
  18. 18 NIST Special Publication 811, Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI), Appendix B.8 — the calorie and kilocalorie (nutrition) conversion factors to the joule (U.S. government work, public domain)source
  19. 19 National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIH), 'Your Digestive System & How It Works' (reviewed Dec 2017; copyright-free by NIDDK's own statement)source
  20. 20 NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, 'Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals' — the definition of an essential fatty acid and the ALA reference intakes (U.S. government work)source
  21. 21 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health Practice, 3rd ed., Lesson 1 §7 'Analytic Epidemiology' — experimental versus observational studies, cohort, case-control and cross-sectional designs (U.S. government work)source
  22. 22 National Cancer Institute, 'Antioxidants and Cancer Prevention' fact sheet (reviewed Feb 6, 2017) — the ATBC and CARET trial summaries (U.S. government work)source
  23. 23 K. R. Westerterp, 'Diet induced thermogenesis', Nutrition & Metabolism 1:5 (2004), doi:10.1186/1743-7075-1-5 — CC BY 2.0source
  24. 24 E. T. Trexler, A. E. Smith-Ryan & L. E. Norton, 'Metabolic adaptation to weight loss: implications for the athlete', Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 11:7 (2014), doi:10.1186/1550-2783-11-7 — CC BY 2.0source
  25. 25 K. D. Hall & C. C. Chow, 'Why is the 3500 kcal per pound weight loss rule wrong?', International Journal of Obesity 37 (2013) 1614, doi:10.1038/ijo.2013.112 (consulted)source
  26. 26 E. Fothergill et al., 'Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after "The Biggest Loser" competition', Obesity 24(8) (2016) 1612–1619, doi:10.1002/oby.21538 (consulted)source
  27. 27 J. A. Novotny, S. K. Gebauer & D. J. Baer, 'Discrepancy between the Atwater factor predicted and empirically measured energy values of almonds in human diets', American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 96(2) (2012) 296–301, doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.035782 (consulted)source
  28. 28 K. J. Acheson et al., 'Glycogen storage capacity and de novo lipogenesis during massive carbohydrate overfeeding in man', American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 48(2) (1988) 240–247, doi:10.1093/ajcn/48.2.240 (consulted)source
  29. 29 K. D. Hall et al., 'Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: an inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake', Cell Metabolism 30(1) (2019) 67–77, doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008 (consulted)source
  30. 30 R. W. Morton et al., 'A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults', British Journal of Sports Medicine 52(6) (2018) 376–384, doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608 (consulted; CC BY-NC by its notice, not adapted)source
  31. 31 National Research Council, Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10th ed. (National Academies Press, 1989), Summary — the protein allowance of 0.8 g per kg body weight for adults (consulted)source
  32. 32 MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia, 'Amino acids' (A.D.A.M.; reviewed 2025-01-21) — the nine essential amino acids (consulted)source
  33. 33 The National Academies, news release 'Report Sets Dietary Intake Levels for Water, Salt, and Potassium To Maintain Health and Reduce Chronic Disease Risk', Feb 11, 2004 — the water reference intakes, the 80/20 beverage-and-food split, and 'no rule of thumb' (consulted)source
  34. 34 H. Valtin, '"Drink at least eight glasses of water a day." Really? Is there scientific evidence for "8 × 8"?', American Journal of Physiology–Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 283(5) (2002) R993–R1004, doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00365.2002 (consulted)source
  35. 35 The Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group, 'The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers', New England Journal of Medicine 330(15) (1994) 1029–1035, doi:10.1056/NEJM199404143301501 (consulted)source
  36. 36 B. V. Howard et al., 'Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial', JAMA 295(6) (2006) 655–666, doi:10.1001/jama.295.6.655 (consulted)source
  37. 37 R. L. Prentice et al., 'Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of invasive breast cancer: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial', JAMA 295(6) (2006) 629–642, doi:10.1001/jama.295.6.629 (consulted)source
  38. 38 Coronary Drug Project Research Group, 'Influence of adherence to treatment and response of cholesterol on mortality in the Coronary Drug Project', New England Journal of Medicine 303(18) (1980) 1038–1041, doi:10.1056/NEJM198010303031804 (consulted)source
  39. 39 A. F. Subar et al., 'Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study', American Journal of Epidemiology 158(1) (2003) 1–13, doi:10.1093/aje/kwg092 (consulted)source
  40. 40 J. D. Schoenfeld & J. P. A. Ioannidis, 'Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review', American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 97(1) (2013) 127–134, doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.047142 (consulted)source
Energy and the Macronutrients — Nutrition: How the Body Uses Food · Shello 拾貝